INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
Why AI Prefers McDonald's Over Skyscrapers
Why cookie-cutter consistency beats custom complexity for early AI adoption.
When most people think about AI in construction, they picture algorithms generating sweeping architectural curves or optimizing the structural engineering of supertall towers.
The assumption is that artificial intelligence belongs in the realm of the complex and the creative, helping architects push boundaries and engineers solve unprecedented challenges.
Alim Uderbekov, CEO and founder of Surfaice, sees it differently.
With a background that spans from optimizing satellite trajectories for the International Space Station to building construction material marketplaces, Alim has developed a contrarian thesis about where AI delivers the most value in construction.
The answer isn't in the Burj Khalifas or the Zaha Hadid masterpieces. It's in the McDonald's.
"The race car of construction isn't a prototype hypercar," Alim explains. "It's a mass-produced sedan." His company, Surfaice, is betting that the future of AI in construction lies not in automating the unique but in perfecting the repetitive.
His co-founder, Genevieve Davis, brings a different lens to this vision.
After 20 years leading store development at companies like 7-Eleven and Kate Spade, she arrived at business school convinced AI would eliminate jobs. "I'd never used AI before. Everyone was talking about it, and I thought, why am I even here? AI is just going to take all our jobs," she recalls.
But her perspective shifted quickly:
"AI is not going to take our job. It's the people who use AI."
That connection between Alim's automation-first engineering mindset and Genevieve's pro-human industry experience shapes everything Surfaice builds.
For an industry drowning in administrative work and fragmented data, this balance represents a fundamental shift in how technology should be deployed.

Why AI prefers McDonald’s over skyscrapers: repetition beats uniqueness. Credit: Shutterstock
TL;DR:
AI works best on repeatable projects, not one-offs. McDonald’s-style rollouts beat skyscrapers because standardisation creates usable data.
Structured data = AI leverage. Thousands of near-identical builds let AI learn, generalise, and execute reliably. Iconic projects don’t.
Surfaice automates the boring 80%. Admin, workflows, documents, onboarding—freeing humans to focus on judgment, deals, and design.
Real results, not hype:~15 hours saved per person per week, 15× productivity from AI agents, onboarding cut from months to hours
The win isn’t replacing people. It’s letting AI handle repetition so humans do the work that actually differentiates projects.
Bottom line: AI wins where speed, scale, and predictability matter most—not where uniqueness does.
Why McDonald's Beats the Burj Khalifa
Alim's "race car" theory starts with a simple question: who in construction requires efficiency the most?
The answer revealed itself when he began analyzing the structure of different project types. McDonald's has built roughly 40,000 restaurants worldwide, nearly all following standardized playbooks with cookie-cutter specifications. Every location follows similar timelines, uses comparable materials, and encounters predictable challenges.
This standardization creates something rare in construction: structured data at scale. While most construction projects generate mountains of unstructured information buried in emails, spreadsheets, and PDF markups, franchise rollouts represent the most organized data ecosystem the industry produces. For AI systems that rely on patterns to function effectively, this structure is essential fuel.
The Burj Khalifa, by contrast, is a dataset of one.
It's a spectacular achievement of human engineering and creativity, but its uniqueness makes it nearly impossible for AI to learn transferable lessons. You can't train an algorithm on a sample size of one and expect it to generalize useful insights.
Genevieve understands this intuitively from her years in the field. "I joined a company in 2016 and introduced Excel and got employee of the year," she says. This anecdote reveals how low-tech store development remains. If spreadsheets qualify as innovation, the industry is ripe for transformation.
But Genevieve is also cautious about where that transformation should focus. Not every process should be automated, and not every problem needs an AI solution.
The Numbers Tell the Story
Surfaice's focus on repeatable projects has produced measurable results:
15 hours saved per week per person through automated workflows. That's nearly two full workdays returned to each team member, previously spent on document routing, status updates, and milestone tracking.
15x productivity gain for one early customer's AI agent versus their entire team. A real estate broker specializing in site searches for Tesla, Amazon, and UPS saw their AI agent outperform the combined output within just six months.
Time collapsed from months to hours for customer onboarding as the system learns. Surfaice's first customer took three months to onboard. Their most recent implementation was completed in two hours.
These aren't hypothetical efficiency gains. They represent the tangible outcome of applying AI where it works best: on the standardized, the repetitive, and the predictable.
From Search Engines to Reasoning Agents
Understanding Surfaice's approach requires distinguishing between two fundamentally different applications of AI in construction.
Most software in the industry today is what Alim calls "horizontal." Tools like Procore or Autodesk's Building Connected serve multiple project types across various sectors. A general contractor building luxury condos might use the same project management platform as a team rolling out retail stores.
Genevieve adds an important qualifier about Procore specifically:
"The number of retailers who actually have Procore are... I have never worked at a company that had Procore because it's expensive."
She explains that businesses selling clothing or groceries aren't developers building stores as their core competency, so they don't invest in that level of IT infrastructure. This insight reveals a crucial gap in the market that Surfaice targets.
Surfaice is building what Alim describes as "vertically integrated AI" that functions more like a trained employee than a software tool.
The distinction becomes clear when you examine what the company calls "skills."
What Makes a "Skill" Different?
Traditional software helps you retrieve information. Surfaice's AI executes complete workflows. Consider the task of ordering a site survey for a new project location:
Traditional Approach:
Search for vendor contact information
Draft email requesting survey
Manually attach property details
Copy relevant stakeholders
Follow up if no response
Surfaice's AI "Skill":
Accesses database of sites under consideration
Identifies the San Francisco location and current status
Locates tenant coordinator information
Gathers property details and lease data
Generates properly formatted survey order
Creates and sends email with full context
The AI doesn't just help you do your job. It executes the job according to your company's specific playbook.
This shift from retrieval to execution represents what Alim calls "reasoning agents" that can self-reflect, self-learn, and adapt to the specific workflows of retail store development.

Negotiation, judgment, and trust don’t scale and shouldn’t. Credit: Haughn Insurance
The Methodology Moat and the Trust Economy
One of Surfaice's early customers gave the AI agent a name: Spike. Team members talk about Spike the way they'd discuss a colleague, asking "Has Spike processed those submittals yet?" or "Let me check with Spike on the permit status."
This anthropomorphization reveals something important about how the technology integrates into daily work. But it also points to Surfaice's core defensibility strategy.
In an era when AI code is becoming commoditized, Surfaice isn't trying to win on technology alone. As Alim puts it,
"We're not trying to sell AI. AI is just a tool. What we're trying to sell and provide our customers is knowledge of how to use AI."
The company's moat is methodology combined with something Genevieve understands deeply: trust. Her approach to go-to-market illustrates this perfectly.
At an industry conference, she met a woman in the bathroom who said, "Genevieve, I've always wanted to work with you. Are you still at 7-Eleven?" When Genevieve explained she'd started Surfaice, the woman's company signed within weeks.
"I just had a client call this morning where a woman I'd known for about 10 years joined a new company," Genevieve recounts. "She said, 'I don't know anything about her product, but I've worked with her for 10 years. I know she's good. I know she's on top of stuff. She's for real. Let's do this.'"
This reveals something fundamental about construction sales that purely technical founders often miss.
Alim acknowledges this: "Construction industry is the only industry where people don't care about the product, they care about the trust."
Why Skills Transfer Across Brands
A project manager who has spent 20 years building McDonald's locations can relatively easily pivot to building Starbucks stores.
The fundamental skills transfer even though the specific requirements differ. Surfaice's AI operates the same way:
Learn to calculate budgets for fast-food rollouts. The AI masters the process of breaking down construction costs, understanding labor rates, and accounting for regional variations in a high-volume QSR environment.
Apply the same underlying logic to coffee shops. While Starbucks has different equipment requirements and aesthetic standards than McDonald's, the budget calculation process follows the same structural logic.
Adjust for different line items and cost assumptions. Espresso machines replace fryers, but the AI understands how to price specialized equipment, factor in installation costs, and account for utility requirements.
This transferability accelerates with each new customer. The AI doesn't just get smarter about individual clients' data. It gets smarter about the process of retail development itself.
The 80/20 Split and What Humans Should Actually Do
Here's where Alim's automation vision meets Genevieve's industry reality.
When Alim describes his ultimate goal of fully automated store rollouts, Genevieve pushes back, not because the technology isn't possible, but because she knows which tasks actually require human judgment.
"This isn't about replacing humans," Genevieve emphasizes. "It's about freeing them from the 80% that's repetitive."
In her experience leading store development teams at companies like 7-Eleven and Kate Spade, she observed a troubling pattern.
Project meetings would spend roughly 80% of their time on administrative topics like milestone updates, deadline tracking, and document status. Only about 20% focused on the substantive questions that actually improve the final product.

Most construction time is lost here, not on design or decisions. Credit: Equipment World
The Questions That Actually Matter
When freed from administrative burden, store development teams can focus on what truly differentiates their projects:
How should the lighting system showcase merchandise? Strategic lighting placement can increase product visibility and customer dwell time, directly impacting sales per square foot
What electrical configuration improves customer experience? The right power infrastructure enables modern payment systems, digital displays, and the technology customers now expect from retail environments.
Which design modifications enhance store efficiency? Small layout changes can reduce labor costs, improve inventory management, and create better traffic flow for both customers and staff.
How can we reduce construction costs without compromising quality? Value engineering requires deep expertise and creative problem solving, identifying savings opportunities that don't sacrifice the customer experience or long-term durability.
Genevieve draws on her experience at 7-Eleven to illustrate the power of proper support:
"I had 80 project managers with 30 support people, so a much higher ratio. And what I saw was that those project managers were managing twice the number of projects even though these projects were way more complicated, like we're putting fuel tanks in the ground, we're moving dirt, doing all this stuff. But because they had the administrative support..."
Most companies can't afford to hire massive administrative teams.
That's where AI fills the gap, handling the repetitive work while humans focus on negotiations, complex problem-solving, and the creative decisions that differentiate one store from another.
Learning from China Speed
This division of labor points toward Alim's ultimate vision, inspired by construction practices in China where skyscrapers can be assembled in timeframes that seem impossible by Western standards.
The secret isn't magic or cutting corners. It's extreme pre-planning where every second, every worker movement, every material delivery gets mapped in advance with precision.
Retail stores are particularly suited to this approach because they're true "race cars" in the revenue sense. Every day a store remains closed represents lost sales.
Alim envisions a future where an entrepreneur could log into Surfaice, upload their coffee shop playbook and financial models, and simply instruct the AI: "Open coffee shops across the UK until the ROI drops below 125%."
That vision remains years away, but the foundation is being built with each standardized rollout Surfaice automates today.
Embrace the Boring (But Know What to Automate)
The immediate opportunity in construction AI isn't in generating award-winning architecture or solving unprecedented engineering challenges. It's in what Alim calls "the McDonald's in your portfolio":
Another retail remodel following the same process as the last 50. The floor plan barely changes, the vendor list is identical, and the construction sequence is entirely predictable. Yet each one still requires dozens of hours coordinating the same milestones.
Another QSR buildout with identical specifications to the previous rollout. The equipment package is standardized, the mechanical systems are pre-engineered, and the permitting requirements are well understood. The only variables are the address and the local contractor.
Another convenience store renovation requiring the same sequence of permits and inspections. The timeline is known, the approval process is mapped, and the potential delays are predictable. But someone still needs to chase every document and update every stakeholder.
These repetitive projects consume enormous amounts of highly paid professional time on tasks that create zero differentiation. But as Genevieve emphasizes, not everything should be automated.
Bidding packages can be assembled by AI, but you still want a human selecting the bidders. Budget analysis can be automated, but negotiations with contractors require human judgment and relationship skills.
The partnership between Alim and Genevieve embodies this balance.
Alim sees the technical possibility of full automation. Genevieve knows which human touchpoints can't be eliminated without losing what makes great projects great. Together, they're building a system that maximizes both.
Let the AI handle the repetitive workflows, the document routing, the status updates, and the predictable coordination tasks.
Save human creativity, judgment, and relationship-building skills for the work that actually moves your business forward: the negotiations that save money, the design decisions that improve the product, and the client relationships that generate the next project.
The "race car" of construction isn't the flashiest project in your portfolio. It's the one that needs to cross the finish line fastest, most efficiently, and most predictably.
That's where AI wins today, and that's where the immediate value lies for any organization willing to embrace the boring while keeping humans where they matter most.
Watch the episode with Alim and Genevieve here 👇👇👇
What's the most repetitive, time-consuming process in your store development workflow? Reply with one answer. We’re collecting these for a strong repertoire of construction tech challenges and probable solutions in 2025 and beyond.
WEEKLY MUSINGS
Blind Boxes, Bios, Sweet Spot
Pivoting to toy unboxing?
The evolution of the "origin story"
Value beyond the sales funnel
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE
Premium Insights
More Insights
Reports and Case Studies
Most Popular Episodes
Super Series
OUR SPONSORS

Aphex - The multiplayer planning platform where construction teams plan together, stay aligned, and deliver projects faster.

Archdesk - The #1 construction management software for growing companies. Manage your projects from Tender to Handover.

BuildVision - Streamlining the construction supply chain with a unified platform for contractors, manufacturers, and stakeholders.


