Seven or eight years ago, four founders used to meet roughly once a month in San Francisco, all part of the same Brick & Mortar Ventures portfolio. Customer acquisition, go-to-market mechanics, introductions to shared accounts: the conversations were practical, the outcomes uncertain. Yves Frinault, one of the four, describes the period bluntly: contech was "completely uninvestable as a space."

Now they're back in the same virtual room. Between them: four acquisitions, four different buyers, a combined transaction value north of $600 million, and enough scar tissue to fill a semester.

Mostafa Akbari-Hochberg sold HoloBuilder to FARO Technologies for $34 million. Yves Frinault sold FieldWire to Hilti for approximately $300 million. Dustin Devan sold BuildingConnected to Autodesk for $275 million. Zach Scheele sold Rhumbix to Autodesk just weeks before we recorded. What follows are the lessons that held up under questioning.

We covered Frinault's FieldWire journey in an earlier edition, but this particular frame bears repeating.

The Hilti story makes the point better than any principle could. In 2017, Hilti visited Silicon Valley on a McKinsey-organized tour and met FieldWire at a session they described, with Swiss-German directness, as purely educational. "We're not here to buy. We're not here to invest. We're just here to learn," Frinault recalls them saying.

Hilti invested in FieldWire's Series B anyway, then passed on the Series C, then ran a full acquisition process for the Series D round, paying approximately $300 million for a company they'd told four years earlier they would never acquire. Their strategy had simply shifted: software had moved, in their own internal reckoning, from optional to essential.

FieldWire negotiated price and post-acquisition vision with a small group of senior Hilti executives before any formal due diligence began. What followed was a lockbox structure: the purchase price was fixed at that point and couldn't be renegotiated based on whatever the due diligence teams found later.

In a standard US acquisition, the post-closing working capital adjustment can move the effective purchase price by millions of dollars. The lockbox eliminates that exposure and changes the psychology of the whole process: when the price can't move, due diligence becomes genuine validation, closing off the prospect of a second negotiation. The underlying principle holds regardless of deal structure: concentrate the critical decisions in a small room before the lawyers multiply.

Corp dev teams at strategic acquirers work from price ranges tied to revenue multiples. A company that has raised at a $170 million pre-money valuation on $2 million in ARR (a real example from the conversation, left unnamed) has effectively closed most of its acquisition window.

The math doesn't work for the buyers who would otherwise be interested, and the company isn't yet large enough for the transformative deals that sit above that zone. Raising at inflated multiples on thin revenue leaves founders in no man's land.

Selling BuildingConnected was more disorienting than Devan had expected. The company had been his entire professional life for years, and losing control of it was a real experience. "It was more emotional for me than I realized because it was my whole life for so many years and then losing control." He hadn't secured a clearly defined role before the deal closed, and the absence of one cost him the post-deal period, including the earnout.

The acquirer's motivation shapes everything about life after the deal. HoloBuilder was acquired by FARO Technologies, a hardware company building its first real software capability.

Akbari-Hochberg walked into an organization where the sales culture had been built around physical scanning equipment and where at least one senior internal stakeholder appeared to view the founder's presence as a competitive threat. "There are other people on the other side who think they can make their job better or generate wins for themselves," he noted.

The contrast with Frinault's experience is instructive. When FieldWire joined Hilti, the team was asked to help build something that didn't yet exist inside what Frinault estimated to be a $7 billion organization, which gave them real influence and operational room. Akbari-Hochberg had the opposite. The question to press before any term sheet lands goes beyond what the buyer wants with the product. Who inside the acquiring organization sees the deal as a threat matters just as much.

HoloBuilder's path to acquisition also shows what actually triggers buyer interest. Multiple enterprise accounts, including Siemens and Frankfurt Airport, told FARO in the same week that they wanted HoloBuilder's offering. The pressure landed at CEO level within ten to twelve days.

Scheele, five weeks post-close at the time of recording, offered the most tactically grounded advice of the session. His deep-dive episode covers the Rhumbix journey in full, including a term sheet that was pulled after signing.

BATNA: best alternative to a negotiated agreement. The cleaner your alternative path, the more credible your willingness to walk. Devan had two competing acquisition offers and a $40 million term sheet in hand simultaneously. That kind of position is rare, but the principle scales down: building toward a genuine alternative, whether another buyer, another round, or a credible path to profitability, changes the texture of every conversation at the table.

Scheele also flagged working capital mechanics as something founders learn about far later than they should. In the final stages of a deal, calculations around AR, AP, and cash at close can shift the effective purchase price by hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars. "Learning on the fly while the deal's about to close is not an ideal situation," he said.

M&A deal volume in E&C has grown roughly 60 percent compared to the pre-pandemic average, per McKinsey. The founders on this call built at a time when what Frinault calls the "$100 million curse" was a genuine cultural constraint. That belief has been revised, largely by the exits the people on this call made.

The harder question for the next generation is whether the decisions they're making now, on structure, on valuation, on who's in the room when the first serious buyer conversation happens, will give them the space to negotiate from a position they actually want to be in.

POWERED BY: